 |
 |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
BOB_SANTANA
Joined: 16 Oct 2006
Posts: 110
Location: HOVE, EAST SUSSEX
|
| Which Complier to get? |
 Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2006 4:06 pm |
 |
|
Hello Everyone.
I am want to move from writting my programs in picbasicpro to using the ccs complier but just wanted to know a few things.
1.)
i want to buy the PCM Command-line Compiler but what i want to know
is that because this is mainly for 16F PIC eg 16f877, when i do
migrate to the 18F series do i have to buy the PCH?
2.) Or should i buy the PCWH if i want to use both 16F & 18F series
Best Regards
_________________
BOB_Santana  |
|
 |
PCM programmer
Joined: 06 Sep 2003
Posts: 21708
|
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2006 4:49 pm |
|
|
This thread describes the two most common paths you can take
with regard to buying compiler(s) and a debugger with CCS:
http://www.ccsinfo.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=26954
Vs. 4.xxx of the compiler is in a beta stage right now. But you can
download vs. 3.249 from the CCS download page. However, given
the limited time period for initial download rights (is it currently 30
or 60 days ?), there may not be enough time for vs. 4.xxx to become
fully usable (ie., out of beta) during your download period.
This situation could lead to some irritation. Just be aware of this.
Also, be aware that CCS is giving away the PCB compiler (vs. 3.249)
with MPLAB. They made a deal with Microchip to do this. Probably
because not that many people use PCB. I copied the PCB.DLL, and
the .CRG file, and the #include files to my normal PICC directory
(which already had vs. 3.249 of PCH and PCM) and now I have all
three compilers. |
|
|
asmallri
Joined: 12 Aug 2004
Posts: 1635
Location: Perth, Australia
|
| Re: Which Complier to get? |
| Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2006 7:20 pm |
|
|
| BOB_SANTANA wrote: | Hello Everyone.
I am want to move from writting my programs in picbasicpro to using the ccs complier but just wanted to know a few things.
1.)
i want to buy the PCM Command-line Compiler but what i want to know
is that because this is mainly for 16F PIC eg 16f877, when i do
migrate to the 18F series do i have to buy the PCH?
2.) Or should i buy the PCWH if i want to use both 16F & 18F series
Best Regards
|
I would take option 3. Buy PCH now. If you are already using the 16F877 move to the PIC18F4620 (pin compatible, faster, far superior instruction set, more ram, more FSR, superior peripherals, SAME COST). The port from 16F to 18F in assembler is not too difficult. My first experience was migrating from a PIC16F877 to the PIC18F452 involved a large, complex program in assembler. I had the code ported in a few hours. Then over the next few days, as I understood better the 18F architecture, I was able to optimize the code specifically for the 18F leading to a 50% increase in performance of my app for the same clock speed.
_________________
Regards, Andrew
http://www.brushelectronics.com/software
Home of Ethernet, SD card and Encrypted Serial Bootloaders for PICs!! |
|
|
BOB_SANTANA
Joined: 16 Oct 2006
Posts: 110
Location: HOVE, EAST SUSSEX
|
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2006 2:23 pm |
|
|
Thanks for your reply i would go for the PCM for now and when i getgood at writting C program i would move to PCH
_________________
BOB_Santana |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ 
Search
Register
Profile 
Log in to check your private messages 
Log in
