View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
ferrousduke
Joined: 31 Mar 2008 Posts: 29 Location: Mumbai, India
|
Virtual terminal |
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 10:17 am |
|
|
Hello,
I have this problem regarding virtual terminal of ISIS Proteus. using latest CCS C compiler but characters are not being displayed normally as in the picture.. printf function seems to be working but everything is ЁЁЁЁЁЁЁ ... what is it that I am doing wrong?
|
|
|
amirharis
Joined: 27 May 2008 Posts: 7
|
re: |
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 7:49 pm |
|
|
hello..
may i know, what version of proteus that u use? |
|
|
dyeatman
Joined: 06 Sep 2003 Posts: 1939 Location: Norman, OK
|
|
|
b77ng
Joined: 22 Jan 2014 Posts: 7
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2014 6:49 am |
|
|
I know that this is a very old topic and I also know the official policy concerning Proteus, but since it was the first result of a "Proteus virtual terminal problem" (or something) search, thought I'd share my findings with other Googlers...
Looks like the VT thing in Proteus is usable but rather buggy. First, I'm sending data with even parity at 9600 baud, in a "null modem" configuration (only RX pin on the terminal is connected) and it only works when the terminal is configured for no parity. Otherwise I get garbage. I have checked the waveform and it does have the parity bit.
Second, using no inter character delays eventually ends in corrupted data but not always. I haven't been able to isolate the exact scenario that causes the problem, but looks like a 1ms delay fixes it. Testing the same scenario with no delays on a physical serial port works ok (!!).
All in all, the VT device is usable and I was able to find some bugs by using it, too bad it has such trivial and likely easily fixed issues. |
|
|
temtronic
Joined: 01 Jul 2010 Posts: 9255 Location: Greensville,Ontario
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2014 7:35 am |
|
|
I don't consider any software 'usable' when you say it's 'buggy' and has data problems (corrupted, but not always). Since it fails in the simplest of all tests, 'loopback', I'm not impressed.
Then again you are talking about Proteus which is well known to NOT be 'usable' when dealing with PICs.
Also the configuration of 8 data bits, even parity is not common. Probably 99.999% of all UART communications is no parity due to the UART architecture being based on 8 data bits these days.
jay |
|
|
b77ng
Joined: 22 Jan 2014 Posts: 7
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2014 8:47 am |
|
|
Well, in case someone is dead set on using Proteus, for whatever reason, and decides to Google the problem...
Worst thing that can happen is a few kilobytes wasted on the server's hard drives. |
|
|
|