| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
vortexe9000
Joined: 07 Jun 2010
Posts: 50
Location: Banned - spammer
|
| fgeee |
 Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2011 8:40 am |
 |
|
sfg
_________________
Banned for spamming his own posts
Last edited by vortexe9000 on Sun Feb 19, 2012 7:45 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
 |
Ttelmah
Joined: 11 Mar 2010
Posts: 19541
|
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2011 9:17 am |
|
|
Seriously, try with a real chip.
Proteus, is a good PCB package, and as an _analog_ simulator, is also good, but it's PIC simulation is foul. I have yet to find anything beyond relatively simple code that simulates properly.
Best Wishes |
|
|
vortexe9000
Joined: 07 Jun 2010
Posts: 50
Location: Banned - spammer
|
| Than |
| Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2011 9:57 am |
|
|
sdcv
_________________
Banned for spamming his own posts
Last edited by vortexe9000 on Sun Feb 19, 2012 7:49 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
|
Ttelmah
Joined: 11 Mar 2010
Posts: 19541
|
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2011 10:18 am |
|
|
I don't agree.
Seriously, even a 100$ chip, is not worth even an hour of a good programmer's time. Even if simulation is 'perfect', you _will_ find problems like noise that only appear in a real circuit. Take advantage of modern prototyping methods (we have a CNC PCB building machine, and pick/place system, that can produce and populate a board overnight), and even without this there are dozens of cheap PCB prototyping companies that will do boards in under 48 hours. The simulator is just wasting time, and costing money...
If you look here:
<http://www.ccsinfo.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=28564>
The people having problems, were with connections, power etc..
Best Wishes |
|
|
vortexe9000
Joined: 07 Jun 2010
Posts: 50
Location: Banned - spammer
|
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2011 2:11 pm |
|
|
sdf
_________________
Banned for spamming his own posts
Last edited by vortexe9000 on Sun Feb 19, 2012 7:22 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
Ttelmah
Joined: 11 Mar 2010
Posts: 19541
|
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2011 3:55 pm |
|
|
Yes, sorry to sound grumpy, but the Proteus PIC simulator gave me so many bugs, and wasted so much of my time, that it actually ranks _below_ CCS, in terms of reliability!... The only piece of commercial software I have ever said this about.
Best Wishes |
|
|
temtronic
Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Posts: 9244
Location: Greensville,Ontario
|
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2011 5:35 pm |
|
|
I have to 'second' the 'get rid of Proteus' comments !! Unless YOU wrote the simulation software YOU do NOT know if it is actually working correctly.
I've never found a simulator in 30 years that did NOT have flaw, errors, faulty DRCs, etc.having worked with 15-20 different microcomputer 'families' the school of hard knocks has always said use real chips!
Only real hardware will give you real results.
As for the cost of the components, I've always had good relations with manufacturers and they've given me all the samples that I've requested.Sometimes I have to pay shipping,usually not. |
|
|
vortexe9000
Joined: 07 Jun 2010
Posts: 50
Location: Banned - spammer
|
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 2:08 am |
|
|
dr
_________________
Banned for spamming his own posts
Last edited by vortexe9000 on Sun Feb 19, 2012 7:20 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
asmboy
Joined: 20 Nov 2007
Posts: 2128
Location: albany ny
|
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 1:34 pm |
|
|
this is the source for one of my favorite simulators --
very affordable - and easy to program with solder 
http://www.pcboard.ca/store/index.php?main_page=index&cPath=10&zenid=j85kskjv59k8n1ep9c86lmfqi4
disclosure: i have no economic tie to this vendor other than porting $$ to them now and then for more product. i favor these because of the included rs232 level shifter layout and DB-9 F traces AND the wide open lead spacing around the pic that lets one use a ZIF socket for the PIC |
|
|
|
FAQ 
Search
Register
Profile 
Log in to check your private messages 
Log in
