CCS C Software and Maintenance Offers
FAQFAQ   FAQForum Help   FAQOfficial CCS Support   SearchSearch  RegisterRegister 

ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

CCS does not monitor this forum on a regular basis.

Please do not post bug reports on this forum. Send them to CCS Technical Support

High Speed communication over DC power lines ?
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
nurquhar



Joined: 05 Aug 2006
Posts: 149
Location: Redditch, UK

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

High Speed communication over DC power lines ?
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 10:48 am     Reply with quote

I have been mulling over what might be involved in getting the PIC's UART's to communicate over a common DC power line supply.

ie Say I have 4 PIC circuits run off a single 24VDC PSU via local DC-DC step downs. The PIC's UART would be hooked upto a modem IC that couples to the 24v line in some way.

I saw an older Topic in which the TDA5051A modem IC was discussed and proved to work. However the max speed was 1200 bps.

Is it possible to get the speed upto say 250kbps or something close ?

I have pair of Ethernet power line adpators which I use so the principle is not new Idea .

To get the speed up I guess the transmission carrier wave is going to have to be pushed into the MHz or GHz range.

Might it be possible to use a Radio transceiver IC in some non standard way ? ie instead of hooking it up to a tuned ariel circuit its just hooked to the 24v line via a capacitor or something Question
temtronic



Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Posts: 9247
Location: Greensville,Ontario

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 12:05 pm     Reply with quote

Have to ask, what kind of distance are you talking about ? Inches, feet or miles ?
I currently have remote SCADA stuff running on solid copper, using +-60 VDC for about 22 miles.
The trade off is speed, further you go, the slower it goes...

So do you really need the speed(250KB) ?
nurquhar



Joined: 05 Aug 2006
Posts: 149
Location: Redditch, UK

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 2:41 pm     Reply with quote

The application idea is individually addressable RGB LED units all strung on a two wire daisy chain. So upto 100m would be ok.

High speed is desirable to be able to do at least 25 updates per second of all the units on the string. There could be a 100 units on the line. I think DMX512 is somewhere close to 250kbps speed and uses it own RS485 type half duplex multidrop.
temtronic



Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Posts: 9247
Location: Greensville,Ontario

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 3:23 pm     Reply with quote

So you really only need one way communication, that helps out.

DMX512 should work ,use low power rs485 chips( Maxim), good for 128 units on the bus.

Simple PIC12F683 ( 8 pin) good for RGB controller,lots of people use them for that.... even me.

You'll have to watch out for I2R power drop, design for worst case(100 units, fully on, with 2/3s near the far end(say 80-100M).
SherpaDoug



Joined: 07 Sep 2003
Posts: 1640
Location: Cape Cod Mass USA

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 6:28 pm     Reply with quote

So you have only 2 wires for both data and DC power?

You could use a power H bridge driver to send a high power RS485 type signal over the wires. Use bridge rectifiers to extract the DC power and RS485 receivers to extract the data. If the signal will be 24V peak to peak, check that the RS485 receivers can take the voltage, or divide the signal down for those chips.

Be careful about the EMI this will generate, especially if this is for a commercial product. Using good twisted pair wire and a LC hash filter at the transmitter will help a lot.

I have done this before, but it was using shielded twisted pair and for use under seawater so EMI was not a problem for me.
_________________
The search for better is endless. Instead simply find very good and get the job done.
nurquhar



Joined: 05 Aug 2006
Posts: 149
Location: Redditch, UK

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 9:39 am     Reply with quote

Dear SherpaDoug

Yes I like your H-bridge driver idea as the concept is simple. I take your point about the EMI, square edge switching of a current of an Amp or two is bound to be noticeable. Especially at a few kHz.

Unfortunately my "underground" site will be a railway tunnel and not a trench in the atlantic. So to make it work I would need to kill the EMI emissions. What does a "LC Hash filter" circuit look like ?

Would using transistor rather than MOSFET H bridge switch help "soften" the "square" edges Idea

What sort of bit rates were you able to get upto in your application ?
SherpaDoug



Joined: 07 Sep 2003
Posts: 1640
Location: Cape Cod Mass USA

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 2:57 pm     Reply with quote

For a hash filter you want to use wideband hash chokes such as these:
http://www.bourns.com/data/global/pdfs/5200_series.pdf
with decent ceramic caps. I would start with a pair of chokes from the H bridge outputs, then a cap across. If necessary add a second stage. Make the LC cutoff frequency at least 10x the serial bit rate. You might find an H bridge driver with slew rate control. Either bipolar transistor or MOSFET H bridges can be made to work well or poorly. Neither is inherently good or bad for EMI.

It might be good to put a terminating resistor at the tail end of the line too. Use an R to match your best guess of the line impedance, and a series cap so the R doesn't consume DC. Make this RC time constant about equal to the LC constant of the hash filter. If possible, twisted pair wire will help a lot.

I only needed 1200 baud, and I got that with no problem.
_________________
The search for better is endless. Instead simply find very good and get the job done.
nurquhar



Joined: 05 Aug 2006
Posts: 149
Location: Redditch, UK

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 5:04 am     Reply with quote

Dear SherpaDoug

Is this the circuit you are describing ?

SherpaDoug



Joined: 07 Sep 2003
Posts: 1640
Location: Cape Cod Mass USA

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 7:20 am     Reply with quote

Yes, that is just what I was proposing.
_________________
The search for better is endless. Instead simply find very good and get the job done.
ckielstra



Joined: 18 Mar 2004
Posts: 3680
Location: The Netherlands

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 8:52 am     Reply with quote

I like this discussion because I was thinking of a similar home brew project.

Instead of differential signalling my first thoughts were to use the technique as used in power line modems. Here a high frequency carrier is superimposed on the power supply lines. At the receiving end the high frequency is filtered out and then decoded.

The power line modem chips are available from multiple vendors, just do a search for 'Homeplug chipset'. This is a solution which has proofed to be working and has little EMC emission problems.
Biggest disadvantage as I see it is the price for these chipsets, starting around $11-USD

What do you people think would be the advantages of the RS-485-like solution when compared to the high frequency carrier?
temtronic



Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Posts: 9247
Location: Greensville,Ontario

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 3:13 pm     Reply with quote

Obviously there's a huge price difference in RAW parts as you pointed out...not to mention PCB layout,R&D time,etc.

other stuff...
The 'carrier' version requires more 'overhead' from a programing standpoint as well as a bigger PIC for the 'brains',hence more $$$.
Also there is the time and labour to get a unit 'up and running'.Learning curve for the 'carrier' chip(s) is greater than simple 'serial' communications .RS-485 chips,etc. are second sourced,carrier stuff is usually one source.

A lot could depend on required throughput,speed, number of devices, etc. It's a tradeoff in time,resources(man hours),chips,etc.

I currently have remote SCADA equipment running 20+miles on solid copper,immune to EMI,hackerproof,etc. but at low speed.
nurquhar



Joined: 05 Aug 2006
Posts: 149
Location: Redditch, UK

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

PostPosted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 3:20 am     Reply with quote

I am quite enthused by the A/C switch power/signal concept. My only real concern is the EMI and developing in the "dark". What I mean by this is; are there any cheap/simple methods of measuring the EMI given off by a system. Having done a bit of reasearch on this about 15yrs ago I think that for proper EMI assesment you had go to a specialist company who hand an EMI measing chamber. Probably something beyond the resources of one man band.

Should I just get my cheap AM trany radio out and see how wild it goes ? Are there any "home" EMI measring techniques ?
temtronic



Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Posts: 9247
Location: Greensville,Ontario

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 5:58 am     Reply with quote

if this is going to be a commercial product,then I'd contact the local government department in charge of 'valdating' the product for the market.The equal to the USA 'FCC', CDN 'DOC' for the UK. getting 'type' approval may cost you more than what you can sell the prouct for ! In Canada building and selling 'home brewed' modems does require proper testing by the Feds($$$$) but I can use preavvoved, over the shelf, external modems freely !!!
Back to the original post, are you in control over the type of wires used for this system or do you have to use others? Need to know the specs of wire size and distance before proceeding.There's an old Motorola Application AN1089(?) that uses their Addressable UART(MC14....) in a classic 'signalling over the power line' technique,actually bidirectional.25 years ago I did a 'proof of concept' using them over 300' ( spool of wire).
The same idea would be real easy for a PIC !
temtronic



Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Posts: 9247
Location: Greensville,Ontario

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 9:38 am     Reply with quote

Search and download the Motorola datasheet for MC14469, page 6 of 10 shows how to get 'rectified power from dataline'.....

I've used a version of this for the past 30 years....sigh, time flies...
Ttelmah



Joined: 11 Mar 2010
Posts: 19553

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 10:03 am     Reply with quote

Many things can be 'legal', but still cause radio problems. Current systems being used for data over power lines, will typically interfere on several of the amateur radio bands. As soon as you start sending signals along nice long bits of wire, you are inherently building a transmitter. Being careful to choose frequencies/encoding to reduce problems like this increases initial cost, but can reduce problems in the future.....

Best Wishes
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group