CCS C Software and Maintenance Offers
FAQFAQ   FAQForum Help   FAQOfficial CCS Support   SearchSearch  RegisterRegister 

ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

CCS does not monitor this forum on a regular basis.

Please do not post bug reports on this forum. Send them to CCS Technical Support

PIC24 - Interrupts Missing
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
richi-d



Joined: 28 Aug 2007
Posts: 106

View user's profile Send private message

PIC24 - Interrupts Missing
PostPosted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 10:29 am     Reply with quote

In the PIC24FJ128GA108 the Header file has missing interrupts for Input capture and output compare.
There are only IC1-IC5. But I need all 9 Input captures.

What can I do without buying an update? Compiler Version is: PCD 4.095
Can I add the vectors manually?

Now I always get this error: Invalid Pre-Processor directive

Code:

////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// INT
// Interrupt Functions: ENABLE_INTERRUPTS(), DISABLE_INTERRUPTS(),
//                      CLEAR_INTERRUPT(), INTERRUPT_ACTIVE(),
//                      EXT_INT_EDGE()
//
// Constants used in EXT_INT_EDGE() are:
#define L_TO_H              0x40
#define H_TO_L                 0
//
// Constants used in other interrupt functions are:
#define INTR_GLOBAL               0x400
#define INTR_NORMAL               0x100
#define INTR_ALTERNATE            0x200
#define INTR_NESTING              0x300
#define INTR_LEVEL0               0x500
#define INTR_LEVEL1               0x501
#define INTR_LEVEL2               0x502
#define INTR_LEVEL3               0x503
#define INTR_LEVEL4               0x504
#define INTR_LEVEL5               0x505
#define INTR_LEVEL6               0x506
#define INTR_LEVEL7               0x507

#define INTR_CN_PIN              0x8000  // or in a PIN_xx constant

#define INT_OSCFAIL               1
#define INT_ADDRERR               2
#define INT_STACKERR              3
#define INT_MATHERR               4
#define INT_DMAERR                5
#define INT_EXT0                  6
#define INT_IC1                   7
#define INT_OC1                   8
#define INT_TIMER1                9
#define INT_IC2                   70
#define INT_OC2                   71
#define INT_TIMER2                72
#define INT_TIMER3                73
#define INT_SPI1                  75
#define INT_RDA                   76
#define INT_TBE                   77
#define INT_ADC1                  78
#define INT_SI2C                  81
#define INT_MI2C                  82
#define INT_CNI                   84
#define INT_EXT1                  85
#define INT_OC3                   90
#define INT_OC4                   91
#define INT_TIMER4                92
#define INT_TIMER5                93
#define INT_EXT2                  94
#define INT_RDA2                  95
#define INT_TBE2                  96
#define INT_SPI2E                 97
#define INT_SPI2                  98
#define INT_IC3                   102
#define INT_IC4                   103
#define INT_IC5                   104
#define INT_OC5                   106
#define INT_SI2C2                 114
#define INT_MI2C2                 115
#define INT_EXT3                  118
#define INT_EXT4                  119
#define INT_UART1E                130
#define INT_UART2E                131
#define INT_UART3E                141
#define INT_RDA3                  142
#define INT_TBE3                  143
#define INT_UART4E                144
#define INT_RDA4                  145
#define INT_TBE4                  146
#define INT_SPIE                  150
#define INT_COMP                  152
#define INT_PMP                   164
#define INT_RTC                   173
#define INT_CRC                   174

#list
bkamen



Joined: 07 Jan 2004
Posts: 1615
Location: Central Illinois, USA

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 10:41 am     Reply with quote

Tell the guys at CCS. A lot of times when you find a bug, you get a free update.

Until then, I typically make a project local copy of the .h file and edit accordingly -- OR add the #defines to your project.

-Ben
_________________
Dazed and confused? I don't think so. Just "plain lost" will do. :D
richi-d



Joined: 28 Aug 2007
Posts: 106

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 10:52 am     Reply with quote

Hello Ben,

thank you for the tipp with the update.
But how can I define additional interrupt vektors? What numbers behind:

#define INT_IC6 ???
#define INT_IC7 ???
#define INT_IC8 ???
#define INT_IC9 ???


do I have to write?
newguy



Joined: 24 Jun 2004
Posts: 1911

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 1:18 pm     Reply with quote

Have a look at the data sheet for the processor. By comparing the defines for the interrupts already in the CCS code you should be able to come up with the proper defines for the missing interrupts. It's all in the data sheet.
FvM



Joined: 27 Aug 2008
Posts: 2337
Location: Germany

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 1:50 pm     Reply with quote

Quote:
By comparing the defines for the interrupts already in the CCS code you should be able to come up
with the proper defines for the missing interrupts. It's all in the data sheet.

It looks like, but it isn't real. The defines are meaningless for PCD interrupt implementation. The real interrupt
information is in the device database (devices4.dat). INT_IC6 to INT_IC9 are still missing with PCD V4.104, by the way.
I don't need them in my projects, otherwise I had complained at CCS.

INT_IC6 to INT_IC8 have an disabled entry in the device database however and can be enabled with the device
editor tool. There's no way to activate INT_IC9, as far as I know. Unlike other compilers, PCD misses any means
to insert entries in the vector table manually.
bkamen



Joined: 07 Jan 2004
Posts: 1615
Location: Central Illinois, USA

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 10:38 pm     Reply with quote

Yea, I was looking at that just now.

There's no relation to the .h entries and the actual device.

Annoying.

More and more, C30 looks like a good thing. I'm considering making the jump after a pretty successful weekend with C32.

-Ben
_________________
Dazed and confused? I don't think so. Just "plain lost" will do. :D
FvM



Joined: 27 Aug 2008
Posts: 2337
Location: Germany

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 12:03 am     Reply with quote

Quote:
More and more, C30 looks like a good thing.

I don't want to contradict strictly. A good point with C30 is, that everything can be done. And (at least as
far as I'm aware of) it lacks of these annoying bugs. But unfortunately most things must be done on your own.
Even with simple peripheral accesses, you're almost lost in a huge amount of include files.

All-in-all, I prefer the CCS embedded C programming approach. I wonder however, when the PCD building site will be finished.
bkamen



Joined: 07 Jan 2004
Posts: 1615
Location: Central Illinois, USA

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 7:39 am     Reply with quote

I totally agree with you FvM, but the bugs... oohhh the bugs.

That and it would be nice to make use of the demo apps and library sources that MCHP writes.. :(

-Ben
_________________
Dazed and confused? I don't think so. Just "plain lost" will do. :D
richi-d



Joined: 28 Aug 2007
Posts: 106

View user's profile Send private message

Bad support from CCS
PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 7:40 am     Reply with quote

This was the answer I got from CCS:

Code:

This message is a reply to CCS e-mail id: 0B5306

You will also need to add then to the device database.  Use TOOLS > DEVICE EDITOR



I feel this answer is a brashness...

1. I don´t use the IDE
2. I want to programm PIC processors and not C-Compilers!

As I understand you, the Compiler updates wouldn´t help? I need at least IC6 to get my project done.
What else can I do?


Thanks
Richard
bkamen



Joined: 07 Jan 2004
Posts: 1615
Location: Central Illinois, USA

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 8:55 am     Reply with quote

Yea, no.

Tell them it's missing from the device database and you can't edit/add it (which I looked too and playing in the editor always makes me cringe).

I would prefer to add ASM to handle it than edit the database.

-Ben
_________________
Dazed and confused? I don't think so. Just "plain lost" will do. :D
richi-d



Joined: 28 Aug 2007
Posts: 106

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 10:08 am     Reply with quote

"I would prefer to add ASM to handle it than edit the database. "

Me too! I not the specialist to manipulate a database!

Any ideas how to do that in ASM?
FvM



Joined: 27 Aug 2008
Posts: 2337
Location: Germany

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 1:46 pm     Reply with quote

Quote:
You will also need to add then to the device database.

I had rather expected, they promise to fix the bug in the next release. But then they must give you a free update.

It doesn't work for IC9, as said. I also agree, that this basically isn't your job. And you should be able to use all device
features without purchasing the IDE.

Unfortunately, you can't set ISR vectors in PCD assembler. Of course, it should be able, also to use 23-bit literals for
jump targets, and possibly a few other assembler features.

CCS should at least send an updated devices4.dat (with IC6 .. IC9). Or a forum member can do.
treanla
Guest







PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:08 am     Reply with quote

Also the DAC interrupts were missing before. I sent an email to CCS and promptly got new devices file and updated header file without any problems from CCS.
richi-d



Joined: 28 Aug 2007
Posts: 106

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 7:16 am     Reply with quote

I don´t get a answer from the support. Thats really not good! I need urgently a solution!!
richi-d



Joined: 28 Aug 2007
Posts: 106

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 8:06 am     Reply with quote

Now I updated the compiler to 4.105 and used the Device editor and checked the Box for INT_IC6. Now another error occours:

Line 32(19,26): Undefined identifier INT_IC6


I think now I need to add to the header file:

#define INT_IC6 XXX


But what number should I write to XXX ?
Any ideas. Where do I find this numbers?
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group