CCS C Software and Maintenance Offers
FAQFAQ   FAQForum Help   FAQOfficial CCS Support   SearchSearch  RegisterRegister 

ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

CCS does not monitor this forum on a regular basis.

Please do not post bug reports on this forum. Send them to CCS Technical Support

why Pic16f877a UART send unknown characters
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
ALPL



Joined: 29 Mar 2009
Posts: 30

View user's profile Send private message

Re: RS232 misbehaviour
PostPosted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 9:21 am     Reply with quote

cse307 wrote:
ALPL wrote:
cse307 wrote:
ALPL wrote:
Next to a possible GND-problem you may not have put a 0.1µF capacitor between Vdd and Vss or the MCLR-pin is not connected/set properly.


the MCLR-pin connected correctly i test it But i did not put a 0.1uF cap is it important??


Better try with the 0.1µF capacitor.


i put the Cap between Vcc and Ground?
i will try it when i have one.
thanks for helping me


Yes, you must put a 0.1µF cap between Vdd and Vss and also 1 0.1µF cap between MCLR and GND (together with a 10K resistor between MCLR and GND).
Ttelmah



Joined: 11 Mar 2010
Posts: 19544

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 9:28 am     Reply with quote

Er. That will stop the chip running. MCLR needs to be pulled _up_, not to GND.

Best Wishes
ALPL



Joined: 29 Mar 2009
Posts: 30

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 10:31 am     Reply with quote

Ttelmah wrote:
Er. That will stop the chip running. MCLR needs to be pulled _up_, not to GND.

Best Wishes


Yes, my mistake - you are right. The resistor to the power line (eg 5V) and not to GND.
cse307



Joined: 03 Oct 2011
Posts: 25

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Sun Jan 01, 2012 6:30 pm     Reply with quote

ALPL wrote:
Ttelmah wrote:
Er. That will stop the chip running. MCLR needs to be pulled _up_, not to GND.

Best Wishes


Yes, my mistake - you are right. The resistor to the power line (eg 5V) and not to GND.


so, i just need one Cap 0.1uF between Vcc and GND.

Dose the crystal oscillator make any difference if goes from 4MHz to 20MHz??
Because i reprogrammed the PIC with just the Printf() to print the text on the screen using RS232 and put some delays and it worked(with the original code NOT). BUT when just replaced the crystal oscillator to 20MHz and of course include it in Code, it returned to same problem !! the baud rate did not changed (9600)?
ALPL



Joined: 29 Mar 2009
Posts: 30

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 12:33 am     Reply with quote

cse307 wrote:
ALPL wrote:
Ttelmah wrote:
Er. That will stop the chip running. MCLR needs to be pulled _up_, not to GND.

Best Wishes


Yes, my mistake - you are right. The resistor to the power line (eg 5V) and not to GND.


so, i just need one Cap 0.1uF between Vcc and GND.

Dose the crystal oscillator make any difference if goes from 4MHz to 20MHz??
Because i reprogrammed the PIC with just the Printf() to print the text on the screen using RS232 and put some delays and it worked(with the original code NOT). BUT when just replaced the crystal oscillator to 20MHz and of course include it in Code, it returned to same problem !! the baud rate did not changed (9600)?


Did you adjust the capacitor values for the 20MHz-crystal (see PIC datasheet)?
cse307



Joined: 03 Oct 2011
Posts: 25

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 9:10 am     Reply with quote

I am using 22pF for 4MHz and I did not change them for 20MHz. Do I need to ?
ALPL



Joined: 29 Mar 2009
Posts: 30

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 9:50 am     Reply with quote

cse307 wrote:
I am using 22pF for 4MHz and I did not change them for 20MHz. Do I need to ?


Check the data sheet first! And then try if the values given by the data sheet work with you project or not - if not -you must try! Normally 20pF-caps should work for 20MHz - for 4MHz 15pF are recommended.
cse307



Joined: 03 Oct 2011
Posts: 25

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 9:57 am     Reply with quote

ALPL wrote:
cse307 wrote:
I am using 22pF for 4MHz and I did not change them for 20MHz. Do I need to ?


Check the data sheet first! And then try if the values given by the data sheet work with you project or not - if not -you must try! Normally 20pF-caps should work for 20MHz - for 4MHz 15pF are recommended.


i don't have a 15pF for now. the 22pf looks it works good with 4MHz and it is in the range 20MHz Cap's in the data sheet.
Ttelmah



Joined: 11 Mar 2010
Posts: 19544

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 10:22 am     Reply with quote

Actually the 'data sheet' has _nothing_ to do with the capacitor values that should be used, unless you are using exactly the crystal models recommended by Microchip....
The _crystal_ will have a specified loading capacitance. The capacitor values want to each be twice this capacitance, less the stray capacitance of the track and the PIC pin.
The data sheet values are calculated for the example crystals _only_, and assuming the board layout is done as in MicroChip's oscillator application note (no ground plane round the crystal legs, short runs etc..).
However, provided the value is not wildly wrong, the oscillator will run, but the frequency accuracy will be poor, really making it pointless spending for a crystal in the first place.

Best Wishes
ALPL



Joined: 29 Mar 2009
Posts: 30

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 11:02 am     Reply with quote

Ttelmah wrote:
Actually the 'data sheet' has _nothing_ to do with the capacitor values that should be used, unless you are using exactly the crystal models recommended by Microchip....
The _crystal_ will have a specified loading capacitance. The capacitor values want to each be twice this capacitance, less the stray capacitance of the track and the PIC pin.
The data sheet values are calculated for the example crystals _only_, and assuming the board layout is done as in MicroChip's oscillator application note (no ground plane round the crystal legs, short runs etc..).
However, provided the value is not wildly wrong, the oscillator will run, but the frequency accuracy will be poor, really making it pointless spending for a crystal in the first place.

Best Wishes


It may be so for very accurate reflections - but even with the internal RC-clock the PICs are very accurate - accurate enough eg for a RTC design which is wrong only 1-2 sec per months (max!). I have some PIC12F683 run accurately for 4 months without deviation!
cse307



Joined: 03 Oct 2011
Posts: 25

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 1:08 pm     Reply with quote

Ttelmah wrote:
Actually the 'data sheet' has _nothing_ to do with the capacitor values that should be used, unless you are using exactly the crystal models recommended by Microchip....
The _crystal_ will have a specified loading capacitance. The capacitor values want to each be twice this capacitance, less the stray capacitance of the track and the PIC pin.
The data sheet values are calculated for the example crystals _only_, and assuming the board layout is done as in MicroChip's oscillator application note (no ground plane round the crystal legs, short runs etc..).
However, provided the value is not wildly wrong, the oscillator will run, but the frequency accuracy will be poor, really making it pointless spending for a crystal in the first place.

Best Wishes


what do you recommend to have a very good frequency accuracy for PIC16f877a with 4MHz OR 20MHz ??
ckielstra



Joined: 18 Mar 2004
Posts: 3680
Location: The Netherlands

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:25 pm     Reply with quote

ALPL wrote:
It may be so for very accurate reflections - but even with the internal RC-clock the PICs are very accurate - accurate enough eg for a RTC design which is wrong only 1-2 sec per months (max!). I have some PIC12F683 run accurately for 4 months without deviation!
I'm happy for you your PIC is this accurate, but according to the specifications this is not something you can account on.
See the datasheet, Table 15-2, parameter OS08:
Quote:
Internal Calibrated HFINTOSC Frequency
± 1% Min:7.92 Typ:8.0 Max:8.08 MHz VDD = 3.5V, 25°C


This means the deviation could be as bad as 36 seconds every hour.
SherpaDoug



Joined: 07 Sep 2003
Posts: 1640
Location: Cape Cod Mass USA

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 3:25 pm     Reply with quote

ALPL wrote:
cse307 wrote:
I am using 22pF for 4MHz and I did not change them for 20MHz. Do I need to ?


Check the data sheet first! And then try if the values given by the data sheet work with you project or not - if not -you must try! Normally 20pF-caps should work for 20MHz - for 4MHz 15pF are recommended.


It is the data sheet of the CRYSTAL that rules here. If you are only looking for +/- 1% for serial comms the exact capacitance does not matter much. But if you are building an alarm clock to keep within 5 minutes per year you need to run your crystal within 10ppm which will require paying attention to these details. The basic frequency, 4MHz vs. 20MHz does not matter.
_________________
The search for better is endless. Instead simply find very good and get the job done.
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group