CCS C Software and Maintenance Offers
FAQFAQ   FAQForum Help   FAQOfficial CCS Support   SearchSearch  RegisterRegister 

ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

CCS does not monitor this forum on a regular basis.

Please do not post bug reports on this forum. Send them to CCS Technical Support

How can I use ECCP in PIC18F4620

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
eminsahin



Joined: 17 Mar 2013
Posts: 5

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

How can I use ECCP in PIC18F4620
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 4:31 pm     Reply with quote

Hi,
I need to generate 40kHz HALF BRIDGE PWM signal with 18F4620. I use compiler of 4.78 and proteus 7.7 . I get output from RC2 (P1A), but I could not get from RD5(P1B). and I must arrange 'dead-time' between P1A and P1B. How can I do that, I find some information by searching but none of them is not useful. can you help me ,
Thanks

Code:
void main()
{

   setup_adc_ports(NO_ANALOGS|VSS_VDD);
   setup_adc(ADC_OFF|ADC_TAD_MUL_0);
   setup_psp(PSP_DISABLED);
   setup_spi(SPI_SS_DISABLED);
   setup_wdt(WDT_OFF);
   setup_timer_0(RTCC_INTERNAL);
   setup_timer_1(T1_DISABLED);
   setup_comparator(NC_NC_NC_NC);
   setup_vref(FALSE);
   
   set_tris_c(0x00);
   set_tris_d(0x00);
   
   setup_timer_2(T2_DIV_BY_1, 149, 1);
   setup_ccp1(CCP_PWM | CCP_PWM_HALF_BRIDGE | CCP_PWM_H_H);
   set_pwm1_duty(80);
   


asmboy



Joined: 20 Nov 2007
Posts: 2128
Location: albany ny

View user's profile Send private message AIM Address

PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 4:35 pm     Reply with quote

Quote:

40kHz

Might this be related numerically somehow to the master clock frequency ... Fosc ??

Quote:

proteus 7.7


School or for REAL ??

I need to ask politely, have you read the applicable section of the datasheet for the part ?

Is there not an equation there that points toward mathematical relationship between master clock and PWM frequencies and resolution ??
temtronic



Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Posts: 9244
Location: Greensville,Ontario

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 4:54 pm     Reply with quote

Unfortunately you're trying to use Proteus which is full of bugs,errors,faulty DRCs.
Odds are real good it'll never 'work'..er.simulate.
rule #1 .proteus doesn't work
rule #2 . re-read rule #1

Your program is not complete( can't run as posted ) and the schematic is missing several very,very importnt details.

However, if you re-read the help files of the compiler(press F11),examine the examples that CCS supplies as wellread the 'timer' chapter of the datasheet for your PIC, the answers are there.

Several of us have already done what you describe,maybe with other PICs using different parameters, but no the less, the PIC will do as it's told.


hth
jay
eminsahin



Joined: 17 Mar 2013
Posts: 5

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 4:58 pm     Reply with quote

yes of course, I read the datasheet, Fosc is equal to 24MHz . I calculated the number of 149 for timer2, to get 40kHz PWM frequency according to mathematical relationship in datasheet, and it provides that.
what is the difference between school or real version for proteus ?
eminsahin



Joined: 17 Mar 2013
Posts: 5

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 5:05 pm     Reply with quote

I am so sorry, I make a mistake, my proteus is 7.10
what do you think about that ?
Mike Walne



Joined: 19 Feb 2004
Posts: 1785
Location: Boston Spa UK

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 5:22 pm     Reply with quote

Quote:
what is the difference between school or real version for proteus ?

You were asked school or real job.

ALL versions of Proteus have similar value.

Follow this link.

http://www.ccsinfo.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=47549&start=0

Please wait to ask questions when you have problems with REAL hardware.

Mike
asmboy



Joined: 20 Nov 2007
Posts: 2128
Location: albany ny

View user's profile Send private message AIM Address

PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 5:33 pm     Reply with quote

Quote:

Fosc is equal to 24MHz


w/ or without HSPLL?

so that implies a
#use delay(96000000);

i'm betting your DELAY is 24mhz and Fosc is 6mhz
and no x4 PLL ???
Mike Walne



Joined: 19 Feb 2004
Posts: 1785
Location: Boston Spa UK

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 5:46 pm     Reply with quote

eminsahin wrote:
I am so sorry, I make a mistake, my proteus is 7.10
what do you think about that ?
The same as we did before.

You're wasting your time and ours by persisting with Proteus.

Sorry, but it's a basic fact of life, that should be taught in school.

Bye.

Mike

EDIT

(This is not intended as comprehensive, but you should get the idea)

Real life goes roughly something like this; you use real hardware, and have a problem, then:-

1) It's your code. Someone here may help you fix it.
2) The compiler produces wrong code. It's a CCS problem, CCS fixes it.
3) Correct code does not load as it should. Programmer problem.
4) Correct code loads, but does not run as it should. Microchip problem.

You're using Proteus, and it's not working as you want it to.
There's a high probability it's a Proteus problem.
Nobody here can tell for certain where the problem lies.

Three of us are already telling you to throw it (Proteus/ISIS) away.
eminsahin



Joined: 17 Mar 2013
Posts: 5

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

PostPosted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 5:10 am     Reply with quote

Quote:
You were asked school or real job.



it is for my school project, Mike Walne

Quote:
i'm betting your DELAY is 24mhz and Fosc is 6mhz
and no x4 PLL ???


you are right asmboy, delay is 24MHz,

PWM Period=[(PR2)+1]*4*Tosc*(TMR2 Prescale Value)

For 40kHz PWM, PR2 must be 149.

should I use another 18Fxx family of PIC ?
Mike Walne



Joined: 19 Feb 2004
Posts: 1785
Location: Boston Spa UK

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 5:49 am     Reply with quote

Quote:
should I use another 18Fxx family of PIC ?
Probably not necessary.
Your serious problem is Proteus.

At the risk of antagonising the moderator again.
I'm asking you as politely as I can:-

1) Throw away Proteus.
2) Read the forum guidelines, and follow the instructions there.
3) Take note of the hints you've already been given.
4) Use REAL hardware.

Mike
temtronic



Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Posts: 9244
Location: Greensville,Ontario

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 6:16 am     Reply with quote

Seems you have only two options.

Door #1) Get a real PIC,cut code, burn PIC and see what happens, stay here and others will guide you.

Door #2) Find a Proteus forum and stay in faulty,'simulator' land.

If you choose #2, you'll never really learn about PICs, programmming or what happens in the real world.

If you choose #1, you'll find out fast that what Proteus says doesn't work,even though it says it's fine.

For example...if you build your project according to the schematic..
1) no VDD applied to PIC
without power PIC can't run
2) no VSS applied to PIC
without ground PIC can't run
3) no crystal attached to PIC
All PICs need a crystal(or some other oscillator)
4) no crystal caps attached to PIC
All PICs with crystals need caps
5) no power source shown
All PICs need a power supply
6) no on/off switch shown
All power supplies need an on/off switch
7) 'scope' shows signals on C and D without input
Odd as NO source is shown
8) 'scope' shows signal on B but counter is 0
This implies the PIC is sending a triangular signal
9) top counter has a reading
odd, CE(Chip Enable) isn't tied high(enabling counter)
10) PIC is not labelled
major problem !
11) *MCLR pullup goes to 'horizontal' +5V
convention dictates vertical resistor to +5 label
12) 'counters' never reset,just increment pulses
so this is a 'tally' counter
13) 'counters' count what ms,sec,sheep,hours??
well it never is reset, so just counts pulses
Several other 'issues' though I trust my point has been made.

There is NO way this circuit will function in the real world!
If you gave this schematic to a fellow tech,'as is', it will NOT work.

As a teacher, I'd have to give you 0 for your schematic as too much is wrong with it. I never let any tech graduate who didn't deserve to.

As an employer, if you handed it in during the job interview (I give 1 hour tests), you would not be hired. Simply put,my company shouldn't have to teach you the 'basics'.

Sigh,I haven't even got to your code. Frankly without properly configured hardware there is no sense looking at the code (which isn't complete BTW).

You( and others) seem to have blind faith in a simulator that is known to be faulty, buggy, incomplete and the list goes on. Perhaps it's a 'generation' thing, but 'old school' guys like me, use real PICs on test boards,cut code, burn the PICs, see what happens, and try again.
This board has a lot of very talented guys, some light years ahead of me, all willing to help, but NONE of us can fix Proteus.
So you'll have to decide will it be 'door #1' or 'door #2' ?

Hopefully Darrin will leave my post up, I'm not trying to be mean or cruel, just show WHY several of us are frustrated with the 'it doen't work and I'm using Proteus' posts that keep coming here !

hth
jay
eminsahin



Joined: 17 Mar 2013
Posts: 5

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

PostPosted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 7:44 am     Reply with quote

thanks
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group