|
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
JAM2014
Joined: 24 Apr 2014 Posts: 138
|
GSM Module Selection |
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 10:02 am |
|
|
Hi All,
I've been using the Simcom SIM900 GSM module for a number of years for a SMS based remote control and telemetry system. Recently, however, a number of cellular carriers here in the US have obsoleted 2G service, and these modules no longer work. As I expect this trend to continue, I'm looking for a more modern (3G/LTE) solution to replace the SIM900, and I'm considering at the Simcom SIM7100C. Does anyone have any experience with this module, or another to recommend? Although this product will ultimately be assembled professionally, a module that can be hand soldered, or is available on a breakout board, is attractive for prototyping purposes.
Thanks,
Jack |
|
|
newguy
Joined: 24 Jun 2004 Posts: 1909
|
|
|
Ttelmah
Joined: 11 Mar 2010 Posts: 19552
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 11:17 am |
|
|
Use the SIM900A, or the SIM900F....
That's the whole point of the difference. The A is the quad band unit, and the F is the 4G version |
|
|
Gabriel
Joined: 03 Aug 2009 Posts: 1067 Location: Panama
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 7:46 pm |
|
|
I've had great experiences with telit and quectel modules from Mikroe.com
I must have 30+ of these deployed.
Edit: obvious but necessary disclaimer... no i do not work nor sell for mikroe....same relationship i have with ccs... it works.
G. _________________ CCS PCM 5.078 & CCS PCH 5.093 |
|
|
Ttelmah
Joined: 11 Mar 2010 Posts: 19552
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2017 12:39 am |
|
|
Key though is that if he has a working code-base for the SIM900, this will run with only minor tweaks on the newer version of this.
I've been this way, and have a library I wrote about five years ago on the SIM900A (needed the quad band), and have since transferred to the 'F'. |
|
|
JAM2014
Joined: 24 Apr 2014 Posts: 138
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2017 9:15 am |
|
|
Ttelmah wrote: | Key though is that if he has a working code-base for the SIM900, this will run with only minor tweaks on the newer version of this.
I've been this way, and have a library I wrote about five years ago on the SIM900A (needed the quad band), and have since transferred to the 'F'. |
Hi,
Yes, it would be nice to stick with another Simcom module for code compatibility! I don't find the information on these modules (SIM900A & SIM900F) to be readily available, even now that I know they exist. Simcom's website doesn't seem to show them, and a web search only turns up scant information, and just on the 'A' version of the SIM900. Where did find the information on these modules?
Thanks,
Jack |
|
|
JAM2014
Joined: 24 Apr 2014 Posts: 138
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2017 9:18 am |
|
|
Interestingly, I have one of these ovens, and it ran 'amok', destroying a one-off prototype. I've found that this oven works great, right up to the moment it doesn't, so I really don't trust it any more!
Jack |
|
|
Ttelmah
Joined: 11 Mar 2010 Posts: 19552
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2017 10:12 am |
|
|
The reason is that the F is a plug replacement for the older module.
Same PCB layout, and 99% runs the same commands.
They just have notes to look at the SIM900 data for it!...
If you look on the SIMCOM site for SIM900 4G, it should take you to this, otherwise you'll need to talk to one of their agents.
It depends how fast you want to go. It only gives class 10 (85600bps).
If you talk to your suppliers, you may well even be getting the 4G version now. |
|
|
soonc
Joined: 03 Dec 2013 Posts: 215
|
Re: GSM Module Selection |
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 7:14 pm |
|
|
JAM2014 wrote: | Hi All,
I've been using the Simcom SIM900 GSM module for a number of years for a SMS based remote control and telemetry system. Recently, however, a number of cellular carriers here in the US have obsoleted 2G service, and these modules no longer work. As I expect this trend to continue, I'm looking for a more modern (3G/LTE) solution to replace the SIM900, and I'm considering at the Simcom SIM7100C. Does anyone have any experience with this module, or another to recommend? Although this product will ultimately be assembled professionally, a module that can be hand soldered, or is available on a breakout board, is attractive for prototyping purposes.
Thanks,
Jack |
If you are North America based them consider:
http://nimbelink.com/skywire-4g-lte-cat-1/
I'm just getting started with it and it has major benefits. In the US low cost data only plans are not easy to find like in Europe.
They also offer a development board that works directly with PC via USb or Arduino if you want to go that way. it's also sold by DigiKey. |
|
|
benoitstjean
Joined: 30 Oct 2007 Posts: 566 Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 6:50 am |
|
|
You can also try the SIM5320A but it's 3G only. Single chip solution, includes a GPS engine (L1 frequency). The internal guts is a QualComm chipset.
To get the documentation, go to http://simcomm2m.com/En/ and you must register.
The global sales network is found at http://simcomm2m.com/En/service/.
Anyhow, been using the SIM5320A for 5 years and it's a great device.
The downside is that the documentation is not great because it's written in very poor english by non-english people. Some sectoions lack information, like netowkr errors and such therefore when the modem returns an error, it's difficult to figure-out what happened.
But, all in all, it is an awesome device once you get it to work and iron-out all the undocumented details.
There is a newer version which is LTE and is pin-to-pin compatible with the 5320 except for a few pins.
If you're wondering, the letter at the end of the modem is for the region: e.g. A is for North-America, J/E is for like Australia and NZ but this is all written in their documentation.
It's also pretty cheap in price.
Ben |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|