CCS C Software and Maintenance Offers
FAQFAQ   FAQForum Help   FAQOfficial CCS Support   SearchSearch  RegisterRegister 

ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

CCS does not monitor this forum on a regular basis.

Please do not post bug reports on this forum. Send them to CCS Technical Support

Timer1 32.768KHz and INTRC_IO

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
ljbeng



Joined: 10 Feb 2004
Posts: 205

View user's profile Send private message

Timer1 32.768KHz and INTRC_IO
PostPosted: Thu Jan 20, 2005 9:55 am     Reply with quote

Following along the lines of the TIMER LATENCY post by darrepac....

I have a 16F628 using the internal rc oscillator and I want to make Timer1 increment from a 32.768KHz crystal. I use the Timer1 interrupt to increment a real time clock. Since timer 1 would take 2 seconds to overflow, I set timer 1 to 0x8000 at the top of the interrupt, then I increment the time value (sec, min, hour).

What kind of latency should I expect?

The registers are being written from the internal rc of ~4MHz. Timer1 is incremented off the 32.768KHz crystal. Won't the registers be reset a lot faster than the 32.768KHz crystal can increment? My first tests show a reload of 0x8000 is too slow and looses time over a few hours.
Mark



Joined: 07 Sep 2003
Posts: 2838
Location: Atlanta, GA

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Re: Timer1 32.768KHz and INTRC_IO
PostPosted: Thu Jan 20, 2005 10:32 am     Reply with quote

ljbeng wrote:
Following along the lines of the TIMER LATENCY post by darrepac....

I have a 16F628 using the internal rc oscillator and I want to make Timer1 increment from a 32.768KHz crystal. I use the Timer1 interrupt to increment a real time clock. Since timer 1 would take 2 seconds to overflow, I set timer 1 to 0x8000 at the top of the interrupt, then I increment the time value (sec, min, hour).

What kind of latency should I expect?

The registers are being written from the internal rc of ~4MHz. Timer1 is incremented off the 32.768KHz crystal. Won't the registers be reset a lot faster than the 32.768KHz crystal can increment? My first tests show a reload of 0x8000 is too slow and looses time over a few hours.


It doesn't matter about the speed of the Timer1 clock. The fact is that you are losing 20 or more uS every second. If it were me, I would use the CCP module. Let Timer1 run free. Setup the CCP for compare mode. Start with the CCP register being set to 0x8000. In the CCP interrupt, you would add 0x8000 to the CCP value. This will give you an interrupt when the timer value is 0 and 0x8000 or every second. The other advantage is that the overall time should not drift. A second increment might be a little off if other ints are occuring but would be made up on the next int so the overall system should never lose time. Anytime you set the Timer1 value, you are bound to lose or gain time.
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group