|
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
fasteddye
Joined: 13 Apr 2005 Posts: 6
|
Problem with RF link getting out of sync |
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 8:41 pm |
|
|
Hey guys,
I am working on a pretty simple RF link using a Linx 315 MHz transmitter and receiver. I was able to adapt some of the code for Manchester encoding and decoding off this site. I am basically sending 4 commands from one end to the other. Everything works great until you walk outside the transmitting range and lose signal and then come back in. For some reason, the receiver is getting data but it can't ever get the 4 commands like before. Once you power cycle the tranmitter, everything is back to normal. Have any ideas?
Transmitter Code:
Code: |
#include <16F818.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#fuses HS,NOWDT,NOPROTECT,NOLVP, NODEBUG
#use delay(clock=20000000)
#use rs232(baud=2400, parity=N, xmit=PIN_B0, rcv=PIN_B1)
int1 forwardbutton = 0;
int1 rightbutton = 0;
int1 leftbutton = 0;
int1 resetbutton = 0;
void SEND_DATA(BYTE txbyte)
{
int i,j,b,me;
b = txbyte;
for (i=0; i<2; i++)
{
delay_ms(10);
me = 0; // manchester encoded txbyte
for (j=0 ; j<4; j++) {
me >>=2;
if (bit_test(b,0) )
me |= 0b01000000; // 1->0
else
me |= 0b10000000; // 0->1
b >>=1;
}
putc(me);
}
}
void remoteprintf(BYTE c)
{
//output_low(PIN_B2);
//delay_ms(3);
output_toggle(PIN_B2);
putc(0xF0);
delay_us(500);
putc(0xF0);
delay_us(500);
putc(0xF0);
delay_us(500);
putc(0xF0);
delay_us(500);
SEND_DATA(c);
delay_us(500); //MAYBE??
putc(0xF0);
delay_us(500);
//output_high(PIN_B2);
}
void main () {
enable_interrupts(global);
set_tris_b(0x02); // 0000 0010 All outputs
set_tris_a(0x0F); // 0000 1111 Pins RA0 1 2 3 inputs
while(1) {
forwardbutton = input(PIN_A0);
rightbutton = input(PIN_A1);
leftbutton = input(PIN_A2);
resetbutton = input(PIN_A3);
//inputs are active low
if(!forwardbutton && !rightbutton)
remoteprintf(0x52);
else if(!forwardbutton && !leftbutton)
remoteprintf(0x4C);
else if(!forwardbutton)
remoteprintf(0x46);
else if(!resetbutton)
remoteprintf(0x43);
}
}
|
Receiver Code:
Code: |
#include <16F818.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#fuses HS,NOWDT,NOPROTECT,NOBROWNOUT
#use delay(clock=20000000)
#use rs232(baud=2400, parity=N, xmit=PIN_B0, rcv=PIN_B1,ERRORS)
int8 i;
BYTE DECODE_DATA(BYTE encoded) {
BYTE i,dec,enc,pattern;
enc = encoded;
if (enc == 0xf0) // start/end condition encountered
return 0xf0;
dec = 0;
for (i=0; i<4; i++) {
dec >>=1;
pattern = enc & 0b11;
if (pattern == 0b01) // 1
bit_set(dec,3);
else if (pattern == 0b10)
bit_clear(dec,3); // 0
else
return 0xff; // illegal code
enc >>=2;
}
return dec;
}
void main() {
char datar,ddl,ddh,datadecode;
int1 status;
set_tris_a(0x00); //0000 0000
set_tris_b(0x02); //0000 0010
disable_interrupts(INT_EXT);
disable_interrupts(GLOBAL);
status=0; //lsb part
datadecode=0;
while(1) {
if (!kbhit()) {
datar = getc();
if(datar!=0xf0) {
ddh=DECODE_DATA(datar);
if(status==0) {
status=1;
ddl=ddh;
}
else {
status=0;
ddh<<=4;
datadecode=(ddh | ddl); //makes 8 bit byte
output_toggle(PIN_A3); //its getting to this point but there is no match after this when "sync" is lost
if(datadecode == 0x46) { //ASCII for F
//go forward
output_toggle(PIN_A0);
}
if(datadecode == 0x52) { //ASCII for R
//go right
output_toggle(PIN_A1);
}
if(datadecode == 0x4C) { //ASCII for L
//go left
output_toggle(PIN_A2);
}
if(datadecode == 0x43) { //ASCII for C
//reset distance counter
//output_toggle(PIN_A3);
}
}
}
}
}
}
|
|
|
|
fasteddye
Joined: 13 Apr 2005 Posts: 6
|
Wanted to add |
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2005 5:49 am |
|
|
I have also tried changing the baud rate to 1200 and 4800 with no change in result. |
|
|
Humberto
Joined: 08 Sep 2003 Posts: 1215 Location: Buenos Aires, La Reina del Plata
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2005 9:08 am |
|
|
In the Tx side add this
Code: |
void main()
{
setup_adc_ports(NO_ANALOGS); // add this line
setup_adc(ADC_OFF); //
.......
.......
.......
}
|
We doesn�t know your hardware. In the transmiter side, PIN_B0 idle state is HIGH,
you�ll need to invert this signal to ovoid the RF transmiter keep modulating RF continuously generating unwanted noise that would block the receiver.
I would change the following function to introduce some pre and postambules STX ETX
and of course in the Rx side you�ll need little changes but this way know exactly when
to validate or ignore the received commands.
Code: |
void remoteprintf(BYTE c)
{
output_toggle(PIN_B2);
putc(0xF0);
delay_us(500);
putc(0xF0);
delay_us(500);
putc(0xF0);
delay_us(500);
putc(0x02); // START OF MSSGE STX ***************
delay_us(500);
SEND_DATA(c);
delay_us(500);
putc(0x03); // END OF MSSGE ETX ***************
delay_us(500);
}
|
In the following function, remove this unnecesary delay. This is not a good place
to introduce a delay. Before this you had been modulating data every 500 us, the RF
receiver is getting this sequence to "get in phase", then suddenly stop and wait 10ms
(for nothing) and you loose all the merit impossed by sending a previous "burst" of 0xF0.
This is mandatory to help to stabilize the RF receiver stage wich is expecting a
signal with 0 DC component.
Code: |
for (i=0; i<2; i++)
{
delay_ms(10); // REMOVE THIS DELAY *************
me = 0; // manchester encoded txbyte
for (j=0 ; j<4; j++) {
me >>=2;
if (bit_test(b,0) )
me |= 0b01000000; // 1->0
else
me |= 0b10000000; // 0->1
b >>=1;
}
putc(me);
}
|
Quote: |
I have also tried changing the baud rate to 1200 and 4800 with no change in result.
|
I would work at 1200 bauds while debugging.
Humberto
Last edited by Humberto on Tue Oct 18, 2005 11:10 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
Guest
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2005 9:51 am |
|
|
Can you explain this futher because I am not sure I understand:
Quote: |
We doesn�t know your hardware. In the transmiter side, PIN_B0 idle state is HIGH,
you�ll need to invert this signal to ovoid the RF transmiter keep modulating RF continuously
generating unwanted noise that would block the receiver.
|
Is there a command for inverting the signal or a way to force B0 low when not using it?
Also, do I need to disable ADC on the transmitter and receiver or just the transmitter? |
|
|
Humberto
Joined: 08 Sep 2003 Posts: 1215 Location: Buenos Aires, La Reina del Plata
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2005 10:59 am |
|
|
Quote: |
Can you explain this futher because I am not sure I understand:
|
To transmit a command you are using putc(data), if you measure the xmit PIN output (PIN_B0 ) while not transmiting you?ll get a HIGH level - idle state -which is right.
From the RF transmiter point of view, you are enabling the RF modulation, which is not
what you expect.
To solve this:
1) For software UART handler.
#use rs232(baud=2400, parity=N, xmit=PIN_B0, rcv=PIN_B1,INVERT)
The PIC16F818 doesn?t have built-in UART at all, so you can use it.
2) For built-in hardware UART, it is necesary to wire an inverter between the Tx PIN and the RF transmiter.
Quote: |
Also, do I need to disable ADC on the transmitter and receiver or just the transmitter?
|
From the PIC Mid_Range Reference Manual (Page 41):
"On a Power-on Reset, the pins PORTA<4:0> are configured as Analog Inputs
and reads as '0'."
Humberto |
|
|
Guest
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 25, 2005 12:20 am |
|
|
Hi,
Whats the need of #include <stdio.h> and <#include <stdlib.h> header file??
If can compile the code without it.....am I doing wrong.
Please help.....thanks |
|
|
Humberto
Joined: 08 Sep 2003 Posts: 1215 Location: Buenos Aires, La Reina del Plata
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 25, 2005 6:44 pm |
|
|
Quote: |
Whats the need of #include <stdio.h> and <#include <stdlib.h> header file??
|
If you are asking if you need both files to run the previous code the answer is no.
Quote: |
If can compile the code without it.....am I doing wrong.
|
To know if you need them, the most common "warning advice" is an error message at
compilation time: "Undefined identifier"
The compiler complain because it does't find the definition of a built-in function used.
In other words, for example if you use the built-in function srand()
you will need to #include <STDLIB.H> where resides the definition for that functon.
Open the C Compiler Reference Manual in Built-In Function section (Page 88-220) and you will see
the library requeriments -if so- for every built-in function.
Humberto |
|
|
Guest
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 25, 2005 11:20 pm |
|
|
Hi Humberto,
Thanks for reply...I'm getting no warning at all!! But the problem is...when I compile the above TX code for 16f84a without those two header file... ROM uses is 24% and RAM uses 6%, after adding the header files...it increases to 25% and 18%....then what could be the possible reason??
Thanks again |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|